At SXSWedu this year, I was slated to do a hands-on session to brainstorm what makes a good collaborative learning space with strong peer learning and to begin building such a thing. The goal was to get people thinking about peer learning, to introduce them to P2PU, and to see what they came up with.
I am often not very good as fostering hands-on collaboration in a conference setting, especially when people don’t know each other. Other challenges included that this session was only an hour long and that the room was set up auditorium style with rows of seats and a podium upfront on a stage.
Despite these challenges, this session went great. Here’s what we did, what went well, and what didn’t. Thanks much to Philipp Schmidt who helped brainstorm and facilitate this.
Brief discussion of what we did: I talked for about 10 minutes, introducing the idea of peer learning and P2PU. I told people they’d be getting into groups (or they could work individually if they wanted) to brainstorm tasks for a peer learning group on ___. I gave them some suggested topics:
- How can we make our classrooms more student-driven?
- How can mobile devices be used for learning?
- How can Twitter be used for professional learning?
- How can we build a digital curriculum?
- …or create your own topic
I said they could brainstorm and/or develop on paper, in a Google Doc (in which I had set up areas for each group in advance), or in P2PU. I asked people to self-group and asked for a volunteer for notetaker from each group. See below for the slides and handout I used.
Then the rest of the time was hands on. At the end of the hour, animated conversation was still going on, and I was told not to interrupt them!
What worked well:
- At the beginning of the session, I said “This is going to be a very hands on session. If that isn’t your thing, feel free to leave.” (Maybe 2 of 45 people left. I don’t know what I’d have done if 40+ left.)
- Giving prompts for groups was mentioned as something that people liked. Everyone pretty easily grouped around 3 of the 4 topics I suggested. (We dropped one.)
- Giving choices both in topic choice, group/individual, and where to brainstorm was well received.
- Three people volunteered to be notetakers. Excellent participation!
- People rearranged the room for groupwork. Here’s what it looked like:
- The Google Doc worked excellently. Here are the results. I don’t think anyone used paper or P2PU (which I figured was too ambitious for this purpose). There is something magic about using a shared Google Doc for this kind of thing – it has worked for me f2f and online and even with the most reluctant groups. Best of all, now I have captured their great thinking for further iteration.
What I might do differently next time:
- Talk even less at the beginning.
- Define additional roles beyond notetaker within each group.
- Don’t have handouts. The were unnecessary.
- Would be nice to have more time to do reports out and possibly some group discussion and iteration.
I got everyone’s emails from this session to follow up. I am certain that we will collaborate further on these ideas and that you’ll see them in future P2PU School of Ed groups.
Slides I used:
Pingback:New P2PU groups seeking collaborators! - K12 Open Ed